- Remember that there is no positive evidence for an actual Jutish Prince, a Jute, Jutland, a real Amleth, and the earliest story could have come from myth, from Iceland, see Saxo, First Nine Books of Danish History at page 402 at http://books.google.com/books?id=-bYZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR3#v=onepage&q&f=false
- Myth? The site examines the Icelandic story, and there are elements of the non-human there. There is also something called the Hrolfssaga, with story parts like the later Hamlet.
- Section 1. Jutland, where the original events apparently occurred, is the west, the peninsula portion of Denmark, attached to Schleswig-Holstein, then part of Denmark, but now part of Germany.
- Section 2. Zealand, where Kronborg Castle and Shakespeare's Elsinore derived from it, is located, is the east, the large island across from Sweden, on the Oresund waterway. Both Kronborg and Copenhagen are located on Zealand.
- Section 3. Fyn, or Funen, is the center portion, the smaller island, and is not part of the Hamlet tale.
How to find out if Shakespeare knew Sonderborg Castle. Sources often just state conclusively that he used Kronborg as the basis for Elsinore, see for example http://www.hamletregained.com/hamletwiki/index.php?title=Time_Period
Why would Sonderborg instead not be the real inspiration for Elsinore. Sonderborg's ramparts, ghosts.
Did Shakespeare say he used Kronborg as his location? It was not completed until 1585; Sonderborg had the longer history. See http://www.hamletregained.com/hamletwiki/index.php?title=Time_Period
"Amleth-Hamlet'" for Saxo could not have taken place at Kronborg because it was not built until 1490; and Saxo specifies "Jutland". Saxo wrote in 1185. Sonderborg was built in 1260 or so.
Sonderborg, then, would place it geographically accurately, on Jutland (see Saxo), and the castle there is on the water and every bit - if not more - historical. See it at http://denmarkroadways.blogspot.com/2010/12/sonderborg-castle-wars-castle-evolves.html.
That was some 700 years before this castle was started. Is that so? See http://www.pathguy.com/hamlet.htm/. For a serious literary overview, see The History of Hamlet at http://www.theatrehistory.com/british/hamlet007.html
B. Others used the story, The Saxo version survived; the Kyd version based on Saxo is lost; the later Shakespeare, probably based on Kyd, survived.
1. 1600-10 Shakespeare's version, probably based on Kyd.
Find Hamlet at http://www.william-shakespeare.info/act1-script-text-hamlet.htm
That presents black ground and white print. For white ground and black print, see http://shakespeare.mit.edu/hamlet/full.html,
Shakespeare bio: 1564-1616. He wrote Hamlet in the period 1600-1610, but earlier drafts could have been written about 1590? That earlier date for drafts could put the drafts at about the same time as Kyd's version.
King Christian IV. Hear music of the era, a Kyrie, at http://wn.com/Christian_IV_of_Denmark, by Mogens Pederson, prominent composer in Denmark 1585-1623. Pederson lived during the reign of Christian IV, and during the life of Shakespeare.
- The Kronborg narrative is clear if Fengi and Orvendil shared a "throne" in addition to Rorik: "In his chronicle, Saxo describes how Fengi murders Orvendil and marries his brother's widow in order to seize the throne." That must mean their joint throne? How old was Amleth when Fengi murdered Orvendil. How did Amleth find out.
- How about Rorik? Would he not take an interest? Perhaps he did. Must read the Saxo. He still reigned on his throne over all of Denmark, with Jutland and the Sub-Brothers being only a part.
2. Thomas Kyd version: probably no later than 1590, given other events in his life
Thomas Kyd wrote a Hamlet character drama (that Shakespeare probably knew, because the story was widespread) was called "Ur-Hamlet". It has been lost. Thomas Kyd bio 1558-1594 Accordingly, it must have been written substantially before even 1595, because Kyd became embroiled in his own tragedy: Turmoil, loss, accused of heresy, tortured for atheism, caught in inquisition intrigues, and finally dying, broken and in poverty in 1594. The play, gone. Who will avenge Tho-o-o-o-m-a-a-a-s-s-s!
The "Ur" in Ur-Hamlet means "primordial", a Germanic root, see http://reaching-lifelong-goals.com/2010/04/hamlet-real-story/ Apparently Saxo's Latin (some think the Latin was a translation from the Gaelic, see Wikipedia) was not translated into English into 1608? More corroboration that Shakespeare probably used Kyd.
3. Saxo's Chronicles version 1185, more accurate date of writing:
Saxo Grammaticus (Saxo, A Man of Letters), wrote the tales as , Deeds of the Danes, in 1185 in Latin, based on earlier spoken tradition. He was from Zealand, see the Folklore Society Saxo introduction to Powell's English translation, below, at xii.
4. Frederick York Powell's version of Saxo. 1893
Find an English Saxo at this 1893 publication by the "Folklore Society" at http://books.google.com/books?id=-bYZAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR3#v=onepage&q&f=false There is a long introduction to the volume, and it includes much more than the Hamlet story. Read about Saxo there.
That is difficult to read as a scan of text in google book form, so read the original written Amleth in a more narrative English translation: D.L.Ashliman.
4. The best for us. D.L.Ashliman version. 2000-2011
Now, this one is exciting.
Read the story Amleth Prince of Denmark, from the Gesta Danorum, edited by D.L. Ashliman of the University of Pittsburgh, 2000-2011, at http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/amleth.html. -- it is more spell-binding than either Saxo's or Shakespeare's Hamlet. Get details of the relationships, motivations, who did what and when to whom, and what happened next, alas! Thank you, Dr. Ashliman. Ashliman also presents wide-ranging folk tales, legends, fairy tales, Germanic myths, sagas.
5. A College.
A contemporary costumed setting, but the real play
We are looking for our photo of a recent Hamlet, seen a few years ago, feigning madness, with Ophelia -- and she is worth a discussion in her own right. She had the potential to be a great character, but Shakespeare focused elsewhere in Elsinore. See http://www.shakespeare-online.com/playanalysis/opheliachar.html
6. And Hamyul/Hamlet - Hamlet in a Korean-language adaptation
Go to New York, the theater LaMaMa -- and rely on the favorable NYT /review, http://theater.nytimes.com/2011/06/29/theater/reviews/hamyulhamlet-korean-language-adaptation-at-la-mama.html?adxnnl=1&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1309352423-IJ5El4bCc3Q6kEKv7/tTYQ. See this reinterpreted Hamyul with: as the review informs, Young Kun Song as Hamlet, Iklyu Park (Claudius), Youn Jung Kim (Gertrude), Man Ho Kim (Polonius), Byungkoo Ahn (Director) and We (hoping to be in an audience, knowing the story and not depending on knowing Korean, which we do not, alas).
And alas, poor Ophelia. Again in the shadows. *
* Why is she so shunted?
Go back to the Saxo Nine Books of the Danish History, google book http://books.google.com/books?id=0oipKqT9UDwC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=falseat page 234. She was shunted aside by Shakespeare as well as Hamlet because he, the cad, had already been married twice, and abandoned the first.
"Shakespeare derived from Saxo's Amleth (Hamlet) the story from which he composed his immortal tragedy. Saxo, however, represents Hamlet as having been twice married, first to a daughter of the King of Britain, whose name does not appear, whom he abandoned to espouse Hermetrude, Queen of the Scots."The Ashliman translation-interpretation, however, has Hamlet married to both at the same time, so his abandonment may have been emotional but did not affect the status, see Ashliman at http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/amleth.html
Ophelia would have been #3.